Dating of the exodus dating for geeks book

Rated 4.80/5 based on 884 customer reviews

That's easily 2 million people (assuming one man, one woman, 1.5 children, which is very conservative). Or the plagues, which would be similarly unlikely not to have been recorded. Given the standard of Egyptian record keeping of the time, this is an absence that would require explanation.

Bible literalists claim that it did happen, but that the Egyptians destroyed all the records, for reasons generally unspecified, though embarrassment has been offered.

While there is a consensus among scholars that the Exodus did not take place in the manner described in the Bible, surprisingly most scholars agree that the narrative has a historical core, and that some of the highland settlers came, one way or another, from Egypt.

Those Canaanites who started regarding themselves as the Israelites would likely have been joined or led by a small "Exodus group" of Semites from Egypt, likely carrying stories and collective memories that made it into the written composition of Exodus: It appears that while many individuals, families and groups were involved in the process of Israel's ethnogenesis throughout the Iron Age, and that many of those who eventually became Israelites were of Canaanite origins, the first group was composed mainly of Shasu pastoralists.

Because the Egyptians never recorded any reverses, or any defeats, of any kind. So, can you imagine the pharaoh in charge saying "By the way, on my watch - under my administration - hundreds of thousands of Hebrew slaves were able to escape when we wanted them to stay in Egypt"? Michael Shermer: Ok, maybe the Egyptians were embarrassed or whatever, but... That's just saying that it's true because there's no evidence for it.

It is unlikely that the 603,550 adult males plus women and children mentioned in the Exodus story would have gone unremarked by contemporary Egyptian records.

1 Kings 6 claims that the beginning of work on Solomon's Temple (sometimes dated to 964 BCE) occurred 480 years after the Exodus, which might then be dated to 1444 BCE or thereabouts.

dating of the exodus-30

dating of the exodus-89

dating of the exodus-43

The alleged refusal by the Egyptians to record the events of the Exodus isn't the only problem, as pointed out by eminent biblical scholar We should observe that the biblical sources for the earlier periods are remarkably unspecific.

And also, that if the Solomonic Temple was built 12 generations after the Exodus (I Kings 6:1) and these are actually 30 not 40 real years, 360 years after 1330 is 970 BCE, again within decades of modern estimates.

The reign of Ramesses II (Ramesses the Great) has long been considered a candidate for the Exodus, due to the biblical reference to the city of Per‐Ramesses,: Critics often say there's no record of their crossing the Red Sea and that sort of thing - totally understandable why.

This article examines the Young Earth creationist and Biblical literalist claims regarding the historical reality of the Exodus of the Hebrew people from Egypt, as well as the evidence relating to such claims.

Mainstream history and archaeology now consider the Exodus to not have happened in the manner described in the Bible, and the story to be a narrative put together between the 8th and 5th centuries BCE, based on earlier oral traditions and collective memories possibly dating as far back as the 13th century BCE.

Leave a Reply